Aeroponic cultivation. What is it? Which one is the best?

Aeroponic cultivation is a soilless agriculture technique where plant roots grow suspended in the air and are nourished by a fine mist of nutrient solution. Unlike hydroponics (where roots are in water) or traditional soil agriculture, aeroponics optimally exposes roots to oxygen while periodically spraying them with nutrient-enriched water. This allows for rapid and efficient growth, minimal water use, and no need for solid substrates. Next, we will explore in detail the history and evolution of this technique, the types of aeroponic systems, their advantages and disadvantages supported by studies, environmental impact, costs, applications in various sectors, common problems with their solutions, as well as future trends and a frequently asked questions section.

History and evolution of aeroponic cultivation

The first signs of aeroponic cultivation date back to the early 20th century. In 1911, Russian botanist V. M. Artsikhovski published the article “On Air Plant Cultures”, describing experiments in which plant roots were exposed to nutrients in the air. This pioneering work demonstrated for the first time that it was possible to grow plants in the absence of soil, absorbing nutrients from the mist or atmospheric vapor.

Over the following decades, several researchers continued to develop the concept. In 1942, scientist W. A. Carter introduced a method for growing plants in water vapor to facilitate the study of their roots. Shortly thereafter, in 1944, L. J. Klotz applied similar techniques by spraying citrus plants with nutrient mist to investigate root diseases. In 1952, G. F. Trowell managed to grow apple trees using a “spray culture”, strengthening the evidence that roots could develop in the absence of soil as long as they received moisture and nutrients in the air.

The term “aeroponics” (from Greek aero, air + ponos, labor) was coined in 1957 by botanist Frits W. Went. Went used this technique to grow coffee and tomato plants with roots suspended in air, to which he applied a fine mist of nutrients, demonstrating the success of “air cultivation”. This milestone marked the formal recognition of aeroponics as a method distinct from hydroponics.

In the years that followed, aeroponics remained mainly a research tool. It was not until the 1980s that commercial applications began to appear. In 1983, the company GTi (founded by researcher R. J. Stoner) launched the market’s first commercial aeroponic system, called Genesis Machine or “Genesis Rooting System”. This device used a high-pressure pump controlled by a microchip to spray nutrients in a root chamber, and it is considered a precursor to modern aeroponic systems. R.J. Stoner, sometimes called “the father of aeroponics in the U.S.,” helped popularize the technology, especially for the propagation (cloning) of hard-to-root plants.

Meanwhile, researchers in various parts of the world explored aeroponics. For example, in 1928 Dr. Franco Massantini in Italy developed an early system known as “cultivation columns” with vertical PVC tubes perforated where the roots grew in the dark inside the tube and were sprayed with nebulized nutrient solution. At the beginning of the 1980s, Dr. Hillel Sofer in Israel designed an aeroponic method (called “aero-hydroponic”) to improve root oxygenation in arid climates, publishing his findings in the American Society for Horticultural Science in 1980.

NASA also played an essential role in the advancement of aeroponics. From the late 1980s and 1990s, NASA has funded research to develop advanced aeroponic systems, seeing in this technique an ideal solution for growing plants in space. The absence of weight makes managing liquids complicated in orbit, but a mist of nutrients is easier to control than a flow of water in microgravity. In 1997, NASA collaborated with AgriHouse (a company of R.J. Stoner) to test an aeroponic experiment aboard the Mir space station, growing beans without soil and studying organic methods of disease control. These efforts not only propelled the technology for space applications but also validated its efficiency on Earth. Indeed, by 2006 NASA reported that aeroponics was already widely used in global agriculture and highlighted its significant water savings and improvements in plant growth.

Today, aeroponics has been incorporated into the agricultural and food industry in various contexts. Vertical farming companies operate urban aeroponic farms to produce leafy vegetables on a large scale, and numerous research centers use aeroponic systems for seed cultivation, propagation of medicinal plants, and other purposes. The evolution from the first academic experiments to its commercial and space use demonstrates the maturity this technique has reached in just over a century.

What are Aeroponic Crops?

Aeroponic crops are an alternative cultivation method, similar to hydroponics, but with differences. The main difference is that in hydroponics, the root is inside an inert substrate, such as arlite, and is almost constantly irrigated with water and nutrients. In contrast, in aeroponics, the roots are simply suspended in the air, without any medium or substrate.

This means that no soil, inert substrate, or water is used to support the plant roots. The plant roots are suspended in a dark chamber and are sprayed with nutrient-rich water at constant intervals. Let’s look at the differences between these two types of cultivation in more detail.

The lack of usable farmland is a global problem. In some cases, it becomes unusable due to environmental factors or because it is destined for non-agricultural tasks.

Marijuana growers using this cultivation system use 95% less water than traditional growers, making it a more eco-friendly system.

In addition to this, aeroponic cultivation can achieve up to four times the yield of growers using more conventional techniques. Aeroponic cultivation does not require a growing medium for plant roots and is a relatively new form of cultivation.

This cultivation method was first discovered as a way to study the root system of plants in the first half of the 20th century. Initially, it was not thought to use aeroponics beyond root research, but this changed over the years and aeroponics has since become a respectable and beneficial way to grow plants.

Many cite Richard Stoner as the inventor and patent holder of one of the first modern forms of aeroponics. In this way, Stoner developed a prototype for growing herbs in a greenhouse and later founded AgriHouse, one of the market’s aeroponic crop suppliers.

Aeroponics vs. Hydroponics

There are different types of aeroponic systems, generally categorized by how they generate the nutrient mist. The two most common approaches are low-pressure and high-pressure systems, each with distinct characteristics, applications, and technical considerations.

Low-Pressure Aeroponics (LPA)

In low-pressure aeroponic systems (Low-Pressure Aeroponics), the nutrient solution is delivered using a standard pump that pushes water through relatively simple spray-type nozzles. Plant roots typically hang above a reservoir filled with nutrient solution, or within a chamber connected to a reservoir, allowing excess liquid to drip from the roots back into the tank. Due to the low pressure, the droplets produced are relatively large (visible to the naked eye) and intermittently wet the roots. These droplets resemble more of a fine rain or dripping rather than an ultra-fine mist.

The advantages of low-pressure aeroponics are its simplicity and lower cost. It requires fewer specialized components: common water pumps (like those used in fountains or drip irrigation) and simple plastic nozzles. This makes many home or hobbyist systems employ this method due to its accessibility. Additionally, these systems are generally easier to assemble and maintain for beginners. For example, aeroponic cloners (devices for rooting cuttings) often use low pressure: a small pump sprays plant cuttings to induce rapid root growth.

However, these systems have some limitations. Larger droplets can reduce optimal root oxygenation (by covering a large portion of the root surface with water) and tend to create dry areas in densely developed roots. If roots grow excessively and form dense masses, certain zones may not receive sufficient moisture from low-pressure sprayers, causing water stress in parts of the plant. Moreover, nutrient delivery efficiency may be lower than with ultrafine mist, leading to somewhat slower growth or lower yields compared to high-pressure systems. Thus, low-pressure systems are considered mainly suitable for small setups or basic research, where plants do not reach excessively large sizes. Overall, low-pressure aeroponics is accepted as a less efficient variant of “true” aeroponics, yet sufficiently useful for practical purposes due to its low cost.

High-Pressure Aeroponics (HPA)

High-pressure aeroponics (High-Pressure Aeroponics) is considered the professional or commercial method, achieving optimal atomization of the nutrient solution. It uses pumps capable of generating high pressure (60–90 psi or more) to force water through specially designed fine nozzles. The result is a very fine mist, with droplets typically in the range of ~30 to 80 microns in diameter, considered ideal for root absorption. Studies (including NASA research) have found that roots absorb nutrients more efficiently when droplets are between 5 and 50 microns, with ~50 microns being a commonly optimal size in aeroponics.

In these systems, roots hang in a dark chamber and are sprayed with mist at frequent intervals controlled by timers. As mist remains suspended in the air longer (due to small droplet size), root contact with the solution is more uniform. This ensures excellent oxygenation and nutrient availability throughout the root mass. High pressure also allows larger or denser plant systems, as microdroplets can cover large areas and penetrate dense roots.

Applications of high-pressure aeroponics are usually commercial or advanced research-oriented. It is used in vertical farms and high-tech greenhouses to maximize yield in leafy greens and high-value vegetables. It is also the preferred method in space research, crop science greenhouses, and certified seed production (such as potato mini-tubers), where higher costs are justified by results. A typical HPA system includes specialized pumps and nozzles, fine filters to avoid clogging, electronic controllers to regulate pressure, pH, and electrical conductivity (EC) of the solution, and environmental sensors, creating a highly controlled cultivation environment.

Unsurprisingly, the main challenge of high-pressure aeroponics is its technical complexity and initial cost. It requires more expensive components (high-pressure diaphragm or piston pumps, durable pipes and connectors, precision nozzles) and expertise to calibrate correctly. Additionally, fine nozzles are prone to clogging if the solution contains impurities or precipitates, making rigorous filtration and cleaning essential. Nonetheless, once installed and managed well, a high-pressure system offers aeroponics’ maximum potential: rapid growth, healthy roots, and higher crop productivity.

High vs. Low-Pressure Comparison: In summary, low pressure is suitable for simplicity and low-cost setups (small-scale, educational, hobbyist), while high pressure delivers optimal performance needed in commercial scale and research, at the cost of higher investment and maintenance. Choice depends on objectives: for high water/nutrient efficiency and maximum yields, high-pressure aeroponics is recommended, whereas for ease and economy, low-pressure systems can be chosen, accepting a slight efficiency loss.

Advantages of Aeroponic Cultivation (vs Traditional Methods)

Aeroponic cultivation offers multiple proven advantages over traditional soil-based agriculture and even other soilless systems like hydroponics. Below are the main advantages supported by scientific studies and data:

• Extreme water savings: Aeroponics is highly efficient in water usage. By recirculating the nutrient solution and minimizing evaporation, it can reduce water consumption by up to 95–98% compared to conventional soil irrigation. For example, NASA reported that well-designed aeroponic systems use only 2% of the water required by soil cultivation to produce the same biomass. This saving even surpasses hydroponics; estimates indicate that aeroponics uses about 30% less water than hydroponics and up to 95% less than traditional outdoor farming. This water efficiency makes it ideal for regions with water scarcity and for sustainable agriculture.

• Efficient nutrient use and no soil required: By directly spraying the nutrient solution onto the roots, there is practically no fertilizer waste. The plant absorbs what it needs, and the rest is recovered in the closed system. Studies indicate that aeroponics can reduce fertilizer use by ~60% compared to soil cultivation. Additionally, since no soil is used, nutrient losses due to leaching into the subsoil are eliminated, and there is no need for soil fertilization. Crop rotation due to soil depletion is also unnecessary. The entire root environment is controlled, allowing precise adjustment of the nutrient recipe for each phenological stage.

• Faster growth and higher yields: Aeroponic plants often show accelerated growth rates due to the simultaneous abundance of oxygen, water, and nutrients at the root level. A well-regulated aeroponic environment can make plants grow faster than in soil or hydroponics. For example, in a NASA-cited case, aeroponically grown tomato seedlings were ready for transplant in 10 days (vs ~28 days in the traditional method), allowing up to 6 tomato crop cycles per year in aeroponics compared to 1-2 in conventional agriculture. Several comparative studies report significant yield increases. A review indicates that aeroponics can boost yields by 45% to 75% compared to soil or conventional hydroponics, depending on the crop. For example, vegetable experiments show more fruits per plant and a higher total weight in aeroponic systems than in soil. In one study, tomato plants in aeroponics produced ~40 fruits with a total weight of ~850 g, versus ~30 fruits and 650 g in soil; cucumbers in aeroponics ~25 fruits (1000 g) vs. soil 18 fruits (750 g); peppers in aeroponics ~20 fruits (500 g) vs. soil 14 fruits (390 g). These data demonstrate the method’s ability to maximize productivity per plant.

• Better plant health and nutrition: In a well-managed aeroponic system, plants tend to develop very healthy roots (large, white, and branched) and therefore absorb nutrients optimally. NASA observed that aeroponic plants can absorb more minerals and vitamins, potentially making them more nutritious for consumption. Additionally, the absence of water stress or anoxia (lack of oxygen) in the roots contributes to vigorous growth. It has been noted that roots in aeroponics can grow larger than the aerial parts (high root/shoot ratio), which is particularly beneficial for root or tuber crops. This root robustness also facilitates the absorption of difficult nutrients (such as micronutrients) and can improve the phytosanitary and chemical quality of products (e.g., higher concentrations of desirable compounds in medicinal plants).

• Multiple annual crop cycles and seasonal independence: Since aeroponics is typically implemented in controlled environments (greenhouses or indoor settings with artificial lighting), it allows cultivation year-round without depending on the climate. Combined with the aforementioned rapid growth, this makes it possible to achieve more annual harvests. This is especially advantageous for fresh leafy greens markets, where continuous production is key. It also enables off-season cultivation of vegetables or fruits, meeting demand regardless of the season.

Disadvantages and Challenges of Aeroponics

While aeroponic cultivation presents outstanding benefits, it also comes with significant challenges and disadvantages to consider, especially when compared to simpler traditional methods. Below are the main drawbacks based on experiences and scientific literature:

• Dependence on equipment and energy: One of the biggest disadvantages is the need to maintain uninterrupted technical operation. Aeroponic plants rely entirely on artificial misting for hydration; they have no substrate to retain water in case of an interruption. Therefore, a pump failure, sprayer malfunction, or power outage can cause roots to dry out quickly. Studies warn that this lack of a “buffer” can lead to irreversible damage or total crop loss within hours if the system stops. In contrast, in hydroponics or soil, roots are surrounded by water or moist soil, providing some margin against failures. This risk necessitates having backup systems (e.g., generators, failure alarms) for valuable crops. The continuous energy requirement also means a higher energy consumption than passive traditional farming; the pump, timers, and other controls add electricity costs that must be factored into operations.

• High initial investment and implementation costs: Setting up an aeroponic system, especially a high-pressure one, often requires a high initial investment compared to other methods. Specialized components (high-pressure pumps, nozzles, sensors, support structures, control systems) are expensive. A study cites that a complete 80 m² aeroponic system in Peru had significant fixed costs, although it later drastically reduced the unit production cost of seed potatoes. There is also a learning cost: the operator must acquire technical knowledge to set up and calibrate the system, which may require training. In summary, on a large scale, aeroponics can be more expensive per square meter than a hydroponic greenhouse or soil cultivation (factoring in greenhouse, climate control, etc.). However, it is important to evaluate the long-term return on investment: in high-value crops or those with many annual rotations, higher yields can offset the initial investment.

• Requires technical skills and constant monitoring: Aeroponics is not a “plant and forget” system. The grower must have a certain level of expertise and dedicate time to supervision. It is necessary to understand and control parameters such as pH, conductivity (EC), water temperature, spray pressure, and irrigation timing, as any imbalance can quickly affect the plants. Unlike soil cultivation, where variations are buffered by the land mass, in aeroponics, the environment is highly reactive: for example, if the nutrient concentration is too high, there is no soil to absorb it, and the excess can burn the roots directly. This requires careful preparation of the nutrient solution and frequent adjustments according to the growth stage. Similarly, nebulizer nozzles must be kept clean and functioning properly, timers must not fail, etc. In short, aeroponics amplifies both successes and mistakes: with expert management, it delivers optimal results, but errors or neglect quickly translate into plant problems.

• Maintenance and risk of clogging: Aeroponic equipment requires regular maintenance to function properly. Fine nozzles are prone to accumulating mineral salts (solution precipitates) or biofilms of algae/microbes, which can reduce spraying efficiency. They must be cleaned periodically and sometimes replaced after a certain period of use. It is also recommended to filter water thoroughly and use high-purity nutrients to avoid particles that could clog the system. This maintenance increases the workload compared to a simple hydroponic system or soil-based agriculture. Additionally, tanks and pipes should be disinfected occasionally to prevent pathogen proliferation in the closed circuit. Without these precautions, problems like blockages or contamination can arise and compromise the crop.

• Sensitivity to environmental conditions: Although plants grow without soil, they still depend on the aerial environment. Aeroponics is usually performed indoors or in greenhouses; if air temperature and humidity are not controlled, exposed roots could suffer. For example, high temperatures in the root chamber can promote pathogens or stress the plant. In fact, maintaining air and water temperature within optimal ranges is crucial to avoid diseases such as root rot (root rot). This may require additional equipment (water coolers, heating, humidifiers) depending on the local climate, adding complexity. Additionally, in dense vertical production, it is essential to ensure all plants receive adequate light (natural or artificial) – light is not a specific problem of aeroponics, but in stacked indoor setups, it relies 100% on costly artificial lighting, which is a factor to consider in implementing this technology.

• Limitations for large-scale extensive crops: Currently, aeroponics is more suited to intensive cultivation in controlled spaces rather than large open fields. It is not practical (due to cost and logistics) to implement aeroponics directly in large-scale open-field farming, as is done with staple grains or pasture. For now, its application is limited to horticulture, floriculture, seed production, and other niche areas. For certain very large crops or mature trees, aeroponics also presents challenges (supporting heavy plants, massive nutrient solution requirements, etc.). Although young trees have been successfully grown aeroponically (e.g., forestry seedlings), bringing a tree to full productive maturity in aeroponics is uncommon and not economically viable in most cases.

In summary, the disadvantages of aeroponics revolve around its technical and operational complexity and the delicate nature of the system: it requires investment, knowledge, constant electricity, and diligent maintenance. One researcher summarized it as follows: “Aeroponics offers great benefits but is not easy to opt for, being an expensive and time-consuming operation.” It is not a plug-and-play method for everyone, but those who master it can far exceed the results of traditional methods. The key is to evaluate costs vs. benefits in each situation and ensure the means to mitigate risks (e.g., having backup systems and proper maintenance).

• Reduced carbon footprint in transportation: Related to the above, urban or peri-urban aeroponics can shorten supply chains. Growing food in cities (vertical farming) makes it possible to consume fresh local vegetables without transporting them thousands of kilometers. This reduces CO₂ emissions associated with food transportation and the need for prolonged storage in refrigeration chambers. Additionally, having resilient local production can improve urban food security in the face of climate changes or logistical disruptions.

• Lower waste generation: Aeroponics does not produce substrate waste (such as rock wool, coconut fiber, etc., which later require disposal) or residues from mulch plastics, bulk fertilizer bags, etc. The main organic waste is plant biomass (roots, leaves), which can be composted. Equipment is reusable for many years. Since there are no pesticide or mass-applied fertilizer containers, these wastes are minimized. Even the water eventually discharged (when renewing the nutrient solution) can be used for garden irrigation, as it is typically just water with minerals.

• Energy consumption and carbon footprint: On the other hand, aeroponics does require electricity to operate pumps, controllers, climate regulation, and artificial lights (the latter in fully enclosed environments). This implies a carbon footprint associated with electricity use, which can be high if the energy source is fossil-based. In temperate climates, an aeroponic greenhouse could use sunlight and moderate climate control needs, achieving low energy consumption. However, in indoor setups with 100% LED lighting and full climate control, the energy required per kilogram of food can be significant. This is an important factor: if electricity comes from renewable sources (solar, wind), aeroponic production can be nearly carbon-neutral; however, with conventional electricity, the carbon footprint may partially offset the environmental benefits of water and agrochemical savings. Energy sustainability is therefore a challenge to address—many vertical farms are integrating solar panels or other solutions to reduce their dependence on the grid.

• Indirect emissions and equipment manufacturing: The construction of aeroponic systems involves industrial materials (plastics, metal for structures, electronics) whose manufacturing has an environmental impact. However, these are durable equipment, and their impact is diluted over years of use. In contrast, traditional agriculture annually uses large amounts of inputs (fertilizers, fuels, plastics) that generate emissions year after year. Even so, it is important to mention that aeroponics is more “capital-intensive,” and the production of, for example, PVC pipes or tanks has its own carbon footprint. The key is to ensure a long lifespan and the ability to recycle these components at the end of their use.

• Contribution to sustainable food security: From a holistic perspective, aeroponics has the potential to make agriculture more sustainable by producing more with fewer natural resources. A review article highlights that these high-efficiency soilless cultivation techniques are a promising solution for food security and sustainable development. By combining water savings, reduced pollution, and high productivity in limited spaces, it can ease pressure on ecosystems (less agricultural land needed) while still achieving year-round harvests despite external climate changes. However, to be fully sustainable, improvements in energy use are needed. Trends such as integrating renewable energy, optimizing LED usage, and utilizing waste heat are underway to reduce the environmental footprint of aeroponic farms. If these challenges are overcome, aeroponics could become one of the most eco-friendly production methods available, aligned with circular agriculture and low-emission goals.

In conclusion, the environmental impact of aeroponics is largely positive in terms of water, soil, and chemicals, with room for improvement in terms of energy. When correctly implemented, it enables clean food production in controlled environments, minimizing water and chemical footprints, making it a valuable tool for more sustainable agriculture.

Costs and Profitability: Investment vs. Long-Term Benefits

When evaluating the adoption of an aeroponic system, it is essential to analyze the costs involved and potential profitability compared to other cultivation techniques. Aeroponics entails specific expenses (many at the start) but also medium- and long-term economic benefits that can compensate for them. Let’s look at the key aspects:

Initial Investment: Implementing an aeroponic farm typically requires a high initial investment. Specialized equipment must be purchased: quality pumps, piping and nozzle systems, cultivation containers or chambers, sensors (for pH, EC, temperature), electronic controllers, support structures, etc. Additionally, it often involves building or adapting an enclosed space (greenhouse or grow room) to control the environment. All of this can add up to a significant figure compared to, for example, preparing land and a conventional irrigation system. For instance, a project reported a breakdown of fixed costs to set up 80 m² of aeroponics, highlighting technology purchases as the biggest initial expense. Likewise, the learning curve can add “hidden” costs—initial errors, calibration, staff training—which must be considered when setting up something new.

Operational Costs: Once running, operational costs include electricity consumption (pumps, lighting if applicable), nutrient replenishment, labor for supervision and maintenance, and occasional replacement of parts (e.g., worn-out nozzles). Compared to a hydroponic greenhouse, aeroponics may have slightly higher electricity costs due to high-pressure pumps and frequent irrigation cycles. However, it saves on other areas: it consumes less water and fertilizer (reducing the purchase of these inputs) and does not require substrates like rock wool, peat, or coconut fiber, which must be periodically replaced in traditional hydroponics. Not using pesticides also saves that cost and simplifies logistics (no chemicals are bought or applied). Regarding labor, a well-automated aeroponic setup may require less daily work for irrigation and fertilization (everything is automatic), though it demands attention to cleaning and monitoring.

Productivity Return: The great potential economic advantage of aeroponics is its ability to increase productivity, which can translate into higher revenues. If an aeroponic system produces, say, 50% more yield per year than a conventional method in the same area, those extra kilos generate additional income that, over time, pay off the initial investment. A clear example is the production of seed potatoes (mini-tubers). Studies in Peru and other countries have shown that while installing an aeroponic module for potatoes is costly, the number of mini-tubers obtained per plant is so high that the unit cost per tuber drops drastically. Reports indicate that the cost of producing an aeroponic mini-tuber reached just 0.0225 USD per unit, compared to 0.11–0.14 USD using traditional techniques, thanks to higher yields (over 2500 mini-tubers per m² in aeroponics). These types of unit cost savings are a powerful incentive for adoption, especially in propagation crops where each mother plant generates many clones or seeds.

Profitability Calculation: To determine profitability, a cost-benefit analysis is usually conducted over several years. The idea is to see in how many cycles or years the extra profits from increased production (or lower water/pesticide expenses) equal and surpass the initial investment. In high-value or fast-cycle crops (leafy greens, herbs, medicinal cannabis, seedlings), the return on investment (ROI) can be achieved in relatively little time due to the continuous crop turnover. For example, high-quality cannabis growers who adopted aeroponics report that accelerated cycles and higher yields per plant allow them to obtain more batches per year, thus offsetting the higher initial costs. Conversely, for long-cycle crops or those with low per-kilo value, aeroponics may not be economically justified.

Long-Term Benefits: Beyond immediate yield, there are other indirect economic benefits: in aeroponics, products are usually premium quality (pesticide-free, better appearance due to no soil-related defects/pest damage), which can increase their selling price. Post-harvest rejection is also reduced (for example, fewer tubers damaged by soil pests), increasing the marketable portion of the harvest. Additionally, as a protected system, it allows for constant cultivation, avoiding losses due to droughts, floods, or other events that would affect traditional crops—this provides greater predictability in production, which is economically valuable. In the context of climate change, this resilience can translate into financial stability for the producer.

Comparison with Hydroponics: Conventional hydroponics has intermediate costs and productivity levels between soil and aeroponics. In general, aeroponics involves slightly higher costs than hydroponics (NFT, DFT, or others) due to additional machinery but offers potentially higher yields. A producer must evaluate whether that performance leap justifies the investment leap. In some cases, starting with hydroponics and scaling up to aeroponics can be a strategy; in others, where water is extremely limited or cutting-edge technology is sought, aeroponics is chosen directly.

Economies of Scale: As technology spreads, it is expected that aeroponic equipment costs will decrease (due to mass production and competition). This will improve profitability. Even today, community and government projects invest in aeroponics for seedbeds or model greenhouses, considering that the social benefit of introducing the technique (e.g., seed import independence, advanced agricultural education) is worth the investment. For individual farmers, profitability will depend largely on market context: crop prices, access to capital, local input costs, etc.

In conclusion, aeroponics can be profitable, but typically under scenarios of intensive high-value cultivation with a medium-term vision. It requires capital and knowledge, functioning more as a future investment rather than an immediate cost-saving measure. When properly planned, water and agrochemical savings, combined with higher yields, often translate into lower production costs per unit than traditional methods. Each project must run its own numbers, but current trends indicate that the cost-benefit gap in aeroponics will continue to close in favor of benefits, especially with the growing demand for clean food and continuous technological optimization.

Applications of Aeroponics in Different Sectors

Thanks to its unique characteristics, aeroponics has found applications in various sectors beyond conventional horticulture. Below, we describe how this technique is used in food production, cannabis cultivation, the pharmaceutical industry (medicinal plants), and space research, among other fields.

Food Production and Commercial Agriculture

The most widespread application of aeroponics is in food cultivation—especially leafy greens (lettuce, spinach, basil), culinary herbs, and some fast-cycle fruits/vegetables (tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers in vertical systems). Vertical farming companies and urban farms have adopted aeroponics to maximize production in controlled environments. For example, AeroFarms (USA) operates one of the world’s largest vertical farms using aeroponic systems at multiple levels, producing over 3 million kilos of leafy greens per year with 95% less water and no pesticides. The product quality is high, delivering clean, pathogen-free vegetables available year-round. Additionally, in traditional greenhouses, aeroponics is used to cultivate premium vegetables where the added value (being organic, tender, and nutritious) justifies the investment.

Another key area is the production of disease-free tubers and root crops for seed propagation. Agricultural institutions in various countries (China, India, Peru, the Netherlands) have set up aeroponic modules to successfully produce seed potatoes, sweet potatoes, and other roots. Aeroponic potatoes are a flagship case: each aeroponic plant can develop dozens of mini-potatoes on its aerial stolons, allowing for rapid multiplication of elite virus-free varieties for distribution to farmers. This is revolutionizing the availability of potato seeds in regions where they were previously scarce, reducing costs and propagation time.

Additionally, aeroponics is being explored for high-value crops such as strawberries, where it could save water in arid climates, or for Asian vegetables that require ultra-clean environments. In organic farming contexts, although aeroponics itself is not certified as “organic” in some countries (due to strict definitions requiring soil cultivation), many implement it under similar standards, avoiding synthetic chemicals and achieving a final product that meets or exceeds organic criteria.

In summary, in the food sector, aeroponics focuses on maximizing intensive production of fresh vegetables near consumers and producing superior-quality seeds or seedlings for large-scale agriculture. Its adoption is growing as technology becomes more affordable and the need for efficiency and food security increases.

A vertical aeroponic system allows for the cultivation of sprouts and vegetables at multiple levels, optimizing space. In the image, a worker harvests microgreens (young greens) growing on vertical aeroponic panels, illustrating the high density and ease of harvest in these systems.

Cannabis and High-Value Specialty Crops

The cultivation of cannabis (Cannabis sativa), especially for high-quality medicinal or recreational purposes, has in some cases incorporated aeroponics to take advantage of its benefits. Although it is not yet common in the industry (most growers use substrates such as coconut fiber or hydroponic systems), those who do use it report impressive results. Pioneering producers indicate that under aeroponics, cannabis exhibits faster and more vigorous growth compared to other methods: “the speed is basically unbeatable,” says a grower who tested different systems, highlighting that when everything is properly adjusted, aeroponics produces extremely vigorous plants.

The cited advantages for cannabis include shorter cycles (allowing for more harvests per year), higher flower yield per plant and per watt of light, and the ability to achieve very high-quality buds. Since there is no growing medium, the roots do not experience restrictions, allowing the plant to channel energy into producing flowers rich in cannabinoids. Cost reductions are also mentioned in terms of inputs such as fertilizers and labor (no need to mix soil, change pots, etc.). Companies like AessenseGrows have developed specialized aeroponic hardware for cannabis, incorporating automated controls to simplify management and supplying dozens of commercial growers worldwide.

However, the challenge is that aeroponic cannabis requires technical expertise to avoid failures that could ruin the harvest. Many growers consider the risk not worth it, which is why it is “rare” to find commercial growers using it. But in highly specialized niches—such as producers aiming to differentiate themselves through quality—aeroponics is finding its place. In Canada and the U.S., some greenhouses use it to standardize growth and facilitate automation in large-scale medicinal marijuana farms.

Another interesting application is the use of cannabis roots. Recent scientific studies have grown cannabis aeroponically to investigate and harvest its roots, which contain medicinal compounds (such as phytosterols and triterpenes). An Italian study found that cannabis plants grown aeroponically developed much larger roots with up to 20 times more concentration of certain bioactive compounds (e.g., β-sitosterol) compared to soil-grown plants. This suggests that aeroponics could be useful in the pharmaceutical industry derived from cannabis, maximizing the production of root-derived ingredients (e.g., for anti-inflammatory topicals) in a standardized and contaminant-free manner. In general, for high-value specialty crops such as cannabis, vanilla, hops, and others, aeroponics offers the opportunity to increase yields and quality, though with the caveat that these are costly systems where any error can impact valuable plants.

Medicinal Plants and Pharmaceuticals

The pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries derive many compounds from plants, and aeroponics is gaining interest as a method to cultivate these plants in a clean and controlled manner. In particular, species where the root or tuber is the primary source of compounds (ginseng, echinacea, turmeric, ginger, among others) can benefit from aeroponics by enabling accelerated and soil-free production (facilitating harvesting and keeping roots free from pesticide or heavy metal contamination).

One example already mentioned is medicinal cannabis (where both roots and aerial parts are utilized). But there are more cases: research has demonstrated higher levels of active compounds in aeroponically grown plants. For instance, a comparative study with herbs and leafy vegetables showed that aeroponically grown plants could have higher levels of polyphenols and antioxidants than conventionally grown ones. This could be due to controlled stress and greater oxygen availability stimulating certain metabolic pathways in the plant.

Institutions like NASA and universities have experimented with aeroponic cultivation of medicinal roots. A study (Pagliarulo & Hayden, 2002) explored the potential of growing medicinal roots in aeroponics within greenhouses, finding it promising. The clean environment and the ease of applying elicitors (substances that induce the production of desired compounds) make aeroponics an ideal platform for producing pharmaceutical secondary metabolites. For example, it is feasible to expose roots to certain lights or compounds in the mist to increase alkaloids or ginsenosides, then harvest the roots rich in active compounds without soil residues.

Additionally, plant biotechnology companies can use aeroponics to grow transgenic plants or “biofactories” that produce pharmaceuticals. In the so-called bio-farming (bio-pharmacy), genetically modified plants designed to produce vaccines, hormones, or therapeutic molecules must grow under highly controlled conditions to ensure purity. Aeroponics provides a sterile, enclosed environment where nothing external contaminates the product and facilitates harvesting the entire biomass of the plant.

In summary, in the pharmaceutical sector, aeroponics is used to cultivate medicinal plants with high purity and potency, optimizing their content of useful compounds. It is also being studied for its role in germplasm conservation of rare medicinal plants, as it allows for continuous growth and rapid multiplication through aeroponic cuttings, helping to preserve valuable species without excessive extraction from nature.

Scientific Research and Space Exploration

Aeroponics was largely born in laboratories due to scientists’ desire to study roots under controlled conditions. Today, it remains a key tool in botanical and agricultural research. Many plant physiology experiments use aeroponic systems to gain visual and physical access to root systems during growth, something impossible with soil. For example, researchers studying root diseases (such as rots or “damping-off”) use aeroponics to deliberately infect roots and observe pathogen-plant interactions without soil complications. By isolating roots in separate mist chambers, they can test different treatments, beneficial microorganisms, or stress conditions in a reproducible and rapid manner.

In plant nutrition studies, aeroponics is also highly useful. It allows for nearly instantaneous changes in the composition of the nutrient solution to observe plant reactions, measure the absorption of specific nutrients, or even collect root exudates (compounds released by roots) for analysis. In fact, the technique has been used for screening (evaluation) of disease-resistant varieties: within a few days, researchers could identify which seedlings resisted the inoculated pathogen, accelerating the selection of tolerant genotypes.

In space research, aeroponics plays a leading role. As part of the vision for growing plants on spacecraft and future habitats on the Moon or Mars, NASA scientists and other space agencies are testing various soil-free methods. Aeroponics has proven to be highly convenient in microgravity, as controlling liquids in space is challenging (they float freely), whereas generating and directing mist is easier. A successful aeroponic experiment was conducted on the Mir space station in the 1990s, and more recently, the International Space Station (ISS) has developed systems like XROOTS (eXposed Root On-Orbit Test System), which combines hydroponics and aeroponics to grow vegetables in zero gravity. These studies aim to understand how roots form in space, how nutrient solutions flow in microgravity, and what adjustments are needed for plants to complete their life cycles. The goal is to eventually have aeroponic systems operating on long-duration missions, providing astronauts with fresh food, water recycling, and oxygen generation. Every kilogram of food produced onboard reduces the payload needed from Earth, which is critical for enabling prolonged space missions.

Another research area is advanced agricultural technologies: aeroponics serves as a testing platform for sensors, precision control systems, and artificial intelligence applied to agriculture (next section). Universities and technology institutes set up experimental aeroponic modules where they train algorithms to automatically detect plant stress, regulate nutrients, or integrate robotics.

In conclusion, aeroponics is deeply intertwined with science and technological innovation. From understanding the fundamentals of plant growth to enabling extraterrestrial agriculture, this technique provides a versatile and controllable medium that continues to expand the possibilities of plant cultivation.

Common Problems in Aeroponic Systems and Their Solutions

Despite its advantages, aeroponic growers face practical challenges in day-to-day operations. Below are some common issues encountered in aeroponic systems and measures to prevent or solve them:

• Nozzle and conduit clogging: The accumulation of sediments, salts, or microbial growth can block the fine misting nozzles, preventing proper fog dispersion. Solutions: Use fine water filters before the nozzles, prepare the nutrient solution with high-quality water (preferably reverse osmosis), and clean the system regularly. Periodic rinses are recommended: for example, every few weeks, circulate clean water or a mild disinfectant solution (such as diluted hydrogen peroxide) to dissolve any deposits. Having spare nozzles on hand is also advisable—if one gets clogged and cannot be cleared quickly, replacing it ensures irrigation continuity. Keeping the nutrient tank covered and free from light reduces algae growth that could migrate into the tubing.

• Pump failures or power outages: A mechanical failure or blackout can stop the flow of nutrients, which, as mentioned, can irreversibly damage plants within hours. Solutions: Have backup power systems, such as batteries or emergency generators, especially in critical commercial installations. Some growers install two pumps in parallel (redundancy) so that if one fails, the other can activate. Integrating alarms or notifications (via SMS, internet) that alert when pressure drops or the pump shuts off can help react in time. In areas with frequent power outages, having a UPS or generator backup is almost mandatory. Additionally, designing the root chamber with a material that retains slight moisture (e.g., dampened sheets) can provide extra time, though the best protection remains electrical redundancy. In small home systems, if an outage occurs, manually spraying the roots with a misting bottle every few minutes can help until the system is restored.

• Root diseases (rot, fungi): Even in a closed system, pathogens can enter through air or water. Root rot (e.g., caused by Pythium or Fusarium) is a serious threat: roots darken and die rapidly. Solutions: Maintain strict system hygiene: disinfect equipment before each new cycle (diluted bleach, heat, or UV treatment in water), use cool water (~18-20°C) as higher temperatures promote pathogens, and ensure good oxygenation (root diseases thrive in anaerobic conditions). Some growers add preventive treatments to the water, such as small doses of hydrogen peroxide, colloidal silver, or commercial solutions that keep roots healthy. Another strategy is inoculating roots with beneficial microorganisms (trichoderma, PGPR bacteria) to outcompete pathogens; however, this must be done carefully to avoid clogging nozzles. It’s also crucial to immediately remove any plant showing suspicious symptoms and inspect the roots of neighboring plants, as pathogens can spread in recirculating solutions. Drain-to-waste systems (which do not recirculate water) reduce this risk but sacrifice water efficiency. Overall, vigilance and prevention are key: if everything is kept clean and within optimal parameters, root diseases are rare in aeroponics.

• Nutrient dosing and unstable pH: Since aeroponic systems typically hold less water than hydroponic ones (smaller tanks) and lack soil buffering, pH and nutrient concentration can fluctuate rapidly. Solutions: Measure daily the pH and EC (electrical conductivity) of the water, adjusting as needed. Ideally, automate pH control with dosing systems that add acid or base when deviations occur. Carefully preparing the nutrient solution—following the recipe and fully dissolving fertilizers—prevents overdosing that could “burn” the roots. A good practice is to conduct partial water changes periodically (e.g., replacing 20-30% of the water weekly) to avoid nutrient imbalances. Also, start with diluted solutions for seedlings and gradually increase concentration as plants grow. Frequent monitoring helps detect any drift before it affects plant health.

• Root temperature and oxygenation: Although roots are exposed to air, if the surrounding temperature is too high, dissolved oxygen levels in the mist decrease, potentially stressing the roots. Solutions: Maintain root zone temperatures within optimal ranges (generally 18-22°C for most crops). If the environment is hot, nutrient tanks can be cooled using chillers or circulated through heat exchangers. Some systems include ventilation in the root chamber to refresh air and maintain oxygen levels. Another tactic is reducing irrigation intervals on particularly hot days so that the mist refreshes the roots more frequently. In aeroponics, passive cooling techniques like shading are less effective (since roots are enclosed), so general climate control of the greenhouse or grow room—using ventilation, air conditioning, etc.—is important. Oxygenation in aeroponics is usually excellent due to ample air exposure; however, ensuring that the nutrient pump does not overheat the water and that mist is finely atomized will help deliver oxygen with each irrigation.

• General equipment maintenance: Besides nozzles, other components require attention. Filters should be cleaned or replaced periodically to maintain flow. Pumps need periodic checks (some diaphragm pumps have internal valves that wear out). Solutions: Follow a preventive maintenance schedule: for instance, inspect hoses and connections monthly to detect leaks or sediment buildup. Lubricate pump components if recommended by the manufacturer. Keeping a spare parts kit (seals, tubing segments, quick connectors) can save repair time. Documenting filter changes, cleaning schedules, and maintenance logs ensures consistency in good practices.

In conclusion, the key to managing common issues is anticipation: maintaining cleanliness, having backup solutions for critical failures, and closely monitoring plants and the system. Aeroponics, by nature, quickly punishes neglect but rewards diligent care. Successful growers develop strict maintenance routines and quality control measures that minimize these challenges. With experience, many risks become manageable, making daily operation smooth. Additionally, advanced technologies (alarm systems, remote monitoring, AI) are making aeroponic management even easier by immediately alerting users to anomalies (see next section).

Advanced Techniques and Future Trends in Aeroponics

Aeroponic cultivation is constantly evolving, integrating cutting-edge technologies to improve efficiency, ease of use, and scalability. Below, we explore some emerging advanced techniques and trends that will shape the future of aeroponics:

• Automation and Artificial Intelligence (AI): Automation is already an integral part of many commercial aeroponic systems (irrigation controllers, nutrient dosing, etc.), but the next step is incorporating AI and intelligent algorithms to optimize cultivation. Research has shown that tools like neural networks can monitor hydroponic/aeroponic systems and detect mechanical or biological issues in early stages. For example, distributed sensors can feed data on solution levels, pressure, pH, humidity, temperature, plant growth, etc., to an AI that learns the system’s normal behavior. If it detects a deviation (e.g., an unusual pressure drop suggesting a clogged nozzle or a root humidity pattern indicating pump failure), the AI could alert the operator or even take corrective action. AI can also dynamically adjust cultivation parameters: studies are exploring systems that modify irrigation frequency or nutrient formulations in real time based on plant needs (detected via imaging or sensors). In practical terms, this translates into “smart” aeroponic farms, where software monitors thousands of plants individually, identifying which require attention and how to maximize overall yield. Large facilities, such as some of AeroFarms, already use machine learning to analyze growth data and refine cultivation recipes with each cycle.

• Computer Vision and Robotics: Related to the above, cameras and vision systems are being integrated into aeroponic greenhouses to monitor plant development (leaf size, color, pest detection) without human intervention. When combined with AI, this enables early detection of nutrient deficiencies or diseases based on leaf coloration and appearance. Robotics is also making its way into aeroponics: robotic arms or mechanical systems could handle tasks such as planting seedlings in aeroponic panels, pruning, or even harvesting. In fact, in vertical aeroponic microgreen and lettuce production, automated conveyor belts already move plant modules to stations where they are harvested by specialized machines. This reduces labor costs and allows large-scale operations with minimal staffing. As robotics costs decrease, we may see highly automated aeroponic facilities operating almost entirely with machines and algorithms, from planting to packaging.

• Design and Material Optimization: Engineers are continuously refining nozzle designs, grow chambers, and materials to improve efficiency. For example, research is being conducted on ultrasonic or nanotechnology nozzles that generate an even finer mist with lower energy consumption. Additionally, anti-biofouling materials (which prevent microorganism adhesion) for tanks and pipes are being developed to reduce cleaning needs. New lightweight and durable polymers enable the construction of modular aeroponic towers that are easy to assemble. There are also experiments with 3D printing to manufacture custom components that optimize mist distribution within root chambers. Another area of interest is genetically enhanced aerial roots: scientists are studying whether certain varieties or modifications can produce more efficient roots for aeroponics (e.g., more branched roots that better utilize mist). While still in its early stages, the future may bring plant varieties specifically bred for aeroponics, similar to how hydroponic-specific varieties exist today.

• Integration with Renewable Energy and Hybrid Systems: To address aeroponics’ energy consumption challenge, a growing trend is integrating solar panels, wind turbines, or other clean energy sources directly into aeroponic farms for energy self-sufficiency. For instance, a greenhouse could have solar panels on its roof powering the pumps during the day, with excess energy stored in batteries for nighttime use. Another idea is utilizing hybrid systems: combining aeroponics with other techniques to create closed-loop cycles. One example is aquaponics-aeroponics, where nutrient-rich water from fish tanks is misted onto aeroponic plants before being filtered and returned to the fish. This could merge the benefits of both systems while reducing dependence on chemical fertilizers. Additionally, geothermal energy is being explored to naturally regulate temperatures in aeroponic greenhouses, lowering heating costs.

• Scalability and Cost Reduction: We are witnessing a trend toward scaling up, with increasingly large aeroponic projects. As this happens, economies of scale in equipment production lower unit costs. Companies are developing plug-and-play aeroponic kits that are more affordable and user-friendly, targeting not only large corporations but also small producers and serious hobbyists. Increased competition in this sector will likely drive innovation and cost reductions, making the technology more accessible. In some developing countries, researchers are already exploring low-cost aeroponic systems using locally available materials (e.g., common PVC pipes and adapted pumps) to allow small farmers to propagate tuber seeds without excessive costs.

• New Crops and Unexplored Applications: While aeroponics is currently focused on horticulture, there is no reason it couldn’t be adapted for other crops with the right adjustments. In the future, we may see aeroponics for cereals or legumes in controlled environments if market conditions justify it (for example, growing wheat or soybeans vertically could become feasible by combining hydroponics/aeroponics if urban demand increases, though it is not yet economically necessary). Another potential application is reforestation: aeroponically growing thousands of tree seedlings inoculated with beneficial fungi (mycorrhizae) has already been tested, offering a way to repopulate forests with stronger seedlings. Additionally, aeroponics could play a role in education: aeroponic kits for schools and universities can foster interest in agricultural and food sciences, preparing a new generation of tech-savvy farmers.

In summary, the future of aeroponics points toward smarter, more automated, efficient, and diverse systems. The vision is to make this technique so simple and reliable that anyone or any community can implement it to obtain fresh food with minimal effort, supported by technology. As AI and robotics continue to advance, many of today’s obstacles (maintenance, constant supervision) will diminish, making aeroponics more “mainstream.” Additionally, its role in space exploration will keep growing—perhaps the first lettuce on Mars will be aeroponically grown. Ultimately, aeroponics aligns with global trends in sustainable and intelligent agriculture, and the coming decades will likely bring innovations we can only begin to imagine in this exciting field.

Supports can have various designs, but they must always include a spraying system, a drainage system, and a structure to support and separate the plant roots. Finally, pumps are used to continuously circulate the water between these components.

The aeroponic cultivation process begins with a seedling grown in a medium (for example, a rock wool cube). This is then placed in aeroponic net pots that allow the roots to pass through. At this stage, it is also advisable to use a cloning collar to support the plant’s stem as it grows.

From this point, the roots will grow from the rock wool and extend through the net pot while the plant develops upwards. Water used to nourish the new plants is supplied through water lines with spray nozzles inserted into the pot support. As the water exits the nozzles, it turns into a fine mist that envelops the plant’s root system.

Excess moisture accumulates at the bottom of the pot bed and is drained back into the reservoir for recycling. Some systems are designed to use the bottom of the pot bed as a reservoir, pumping water directly back into the water lines. While this approach can work well, it makes it harder to control the reservoir without disturbing the roots.

Aeroponic Cultivation Systems

We recommend two highly efficient aeroponic systems, one for seedlings and cuttings and another for full-scale cultivation. Both are of the highest quality at a very attractive price.

CUTTINGBOARD

The Cutting Board by Terra Aquatica is an ideal aeroponic system for cuttings and small plants. It allows for perfectly rooted cuttings with a well-developed root mass, ready for successful transplantation.

DUTCH POT AERO

The entire hydroponic cultivation process we’ve discussed is simplified with the use of Dutch Pot Aero: the simplest and most efficient aeroponic system available. It’s perfect for beginners who don’t want to spend too much time building a DIY aeroponic setup, which can often be less reliable and harder to automate.

Instead of having to set up a reservoir, net pots, tubing systems, and many other components, with Dutch Pot Aero, you simply fill the small pots with seedlings, and you’re ready to go. Dutch Pot Hydro units are made from recycled plastic with UV protection, giving them a long lifespan.

Its closed-circuit irrigation system also allows for significant water and nutrient solution savings, and the system generates no harmful waste for the environment.

This flexibility and adaptability allow the system to adjust easily to different seasons.

Quality Makes the Difference

There is a wide variety of aeroponic cultivation systems to choose from. A high-quality system will feature two reservoirs—one for spraying water onto the roots and another for collecting excess water. This ensures that the roots always have access to clean water and allows for greater control over the system.

A premium system, like Dutch Pot Aero, also includes special spray nozzles and high-pressure pumps. When combined, they create a mist as fine as the tiny droplets forming fog. These droplets, which are smaller than 50 microns, are so fine that they are invisible to the naked eye.

With a properly functioning aeroponic system, the plant roots receive an equal amount of water. Additionally, you don’t have to worry about water escaping from the sides of the reservoir, as the system comes equipped with sensors. When water escapes, it is wasted along with the nutrients, and the humidity in the grow room increases.

A low-quality aeroponic system sprays large droplets onto the roots. Additionally, these DIY systems often lack a proper separation method between the reservoirs. If this happens, you may end up with an unbalanced pH level. You also won’t have control over what is sprayed onto the roots.

More Equipment for Aeroponic Cultivation

We recommend investing in a high-quality timer and stable wiring. This setup ensures that the misting timer is perfectly synchronized. Instead of spraying mist at random intervals, make sure to set the timer to mist the nutrient solution every few seconds.

Ensure that the root temperature does not exceed 22ºC. The ideal temperature range is between 17 and 20 degrees. A water chiller is a practical way to control water temperature.

We also recommend using CFL or LED lights for aeroponics because they help regulate room temperature. If the grow room seems excessively warm, you can adjust the ventilation and extraction system, as well as use heat sinks or light reflectors. This helps reduce the water temperature.

Related Articles

Conclusion on Aeroponic Cultivation

Although aeroponic equipment may seem expensive, growers agree that the final product makes the investment worth it. This combination of indoor cultivation and the direct application of nutrients to plant roots helps develop large Cannabis buds.

In 2001, a study from the University of Arizona analyzed the effect of aeroponics on two plants. These two plants, burdock and echinacea, are known for their medicinal properties. Burdock performed exceptionally well under aeroponic conditions.

This method produced yields that were nearly 1,000% higher than the average burdock yield in field cultivation. Additionally, the lack of soil ensured that harvesting was more convenient.

The cannabis industry is at the forefront of aeroponic technology implementation. In addition to providing higher yields and using less water, aeroponics could potentially be used to increase food production. Given Earth’s rapidly growing population, this could be an extremely useful future application of aeroponics.

In conclusion, indoor aeroponic cultivation is a highly effective method for growing plants, enabling faster growth, higher yields, and a greater variety of crops. However, it also requires specialized equipment and a higher level of maintenance. Whether indoor aeroponic cultivation is right for you will depend on your specific growing needs and preferences.

¡Haz clic para puntuar esta entrada!

(Votos: 0 Promedio: 0)

 

Brais Nieto

Founder of Experiencia Natural, creative and entrepreneur, designer, master in grower and marketing. For a normalization of all plants and substances, giving priority to patients and users.